SAT 3-8-6 EDITORIAL >> Beebe sues payday lenders
Money in a Flash.net does make loans, you see, so it claims that the law limiting interest rate charges does not apply to it. So 520 percent interest does not mean anything. Money in a Flash.net contracts with consumers for internet service and charges an annual fee. It “rebates” money to the consumers up front and they pay it back all year. For example, it may “rebate” someone $300 and then over the next year they pay the company biweekly, up to $1,500 over a year. Beebe’s suit maintains that the rebate is a ruse. It’s really a loan to a desperate person, who winds up paying it back five times over in a year.
Of course it is a loan and of course it is illegal.
But Money in a Flash.net is worse only by degrees than scores of other check-cashing companies that charge interest rates many times the lawful limit by disguising interest as something else. Beebe and his predecessor, Mark Pryor, never went after them.
For 50 years, lenders, including big banks and merchants, could not get by with such schemes. They couldn’t fudge even slightly.
The Arkansas Supreme Court interpreted the usury provision in the Constitution to mean what it said and tolerated no nonsense. The law was weakened a bit and the courts have become a trifle more pliant. But in the end, this year perhaps, we trust that the justices will give consumers some justice and hold these payday-lending schemes, all of them, to be beyond the pale.
Meantime, please extend medium-sized congratulations to General Beebe.